4-ACETOXY-2-ETHYL-6-FLUORO-3-METHYLQUINOLINE


Source	Gaulton A, Kale N, van Westen GJ, Bellis LJ, Bento AP, Davies M, Hersey A, Papadatos G, Forster M, Wege P, Overington JP. A large-scale crop protection bioassay data set. Sci Data. 2015 Jul 7;2:150032. Read more ...


Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Bioactive chemicals	Exact Similarity SubStructure	Threshold (%) >= 70

Structure


InChI Key	MRIVBHZSBLWDDP-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Smiles	CCc1nc2ccc(F)cc2c(OC(=O)C)c1C
InChI	InChI=1S/C14H14FNO2/c1-4-12-8(2)14(18-9(3)17)11-7-10(15)5-6-13(11)16-12/h5-7H,4H2,1-3H3

Physicochemical Descriptors

Property Name	Value
Molecular Formula	C14H14FNO2
Molecular Weight	247.26
AlogP	3.43
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor	3.0
Hydrogen Bond Donor	0.0
Number of Rotational Bond	3.0
Polar Surface Area	39.19
Molecular species	NEUTRAL
Aromatic Rings	2.0
Heavy Atoms	18.0

Assay Description	Organism	Bioactivity
Insecticidal activity against Bombyx mori Syogetsu x Syunrei third-instar larvae assessed as insect mortality upon topical application at 1 ug measured 48 hr post compound treatment	Bombyx mori	100.0 %
Insecticidal activity against Bombyx mori Syogetsu x Syunrei third-instar larvae assessed as insect mortality upon topical application at 0.3 ug measured 48 hr post compound treatment	Bombyx mori	70.0 %
Insecticidal activity against Spodoptera litura third-instar larvae reared on artificial diets of Insecta LF assessed as insect mortality at 1000 ppm measured 2 days post compound treatment	Spodoptera litura	None
Insecticidal activity against Spodoptera litura third-instar larvae reared on artificial diets of Insecta LF assessed as insect mortality at 500 ppm measured 2 days post compound treatment	Spodoptera litura	100.0 %
Insecticidal activity against Spodoptera litura third-instar larvae reared on artificial diets of Insecta LF assessed as insect mortality at 250 ppm measured 2 days post compound treatment	Spodoptera litura	90.0 %
Insecticidal activity against Spodoptera litura third-instar larvae reared on artificial diets of Insecta LF assessed as insect mortality at 125 ppm measured 2 days post compound treatment	Spodoptera litura	55.0 %
Insecticidal activity against Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) third-instar larvae reared on cabbage plants leaves pre-treated with 1000 ppm compound assessed as insect mortality measured 2 days post compound treatment	Plutella xylostella	97.5 %
Insecticidal activity against Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) third-instar larvae reared on cabbage plants leaves pre-treated with 500 ppm compound assessed as insect mortality measured 2 days post compound treatment	Plutella xylostella	70.0 %
Insecticidal activity against Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) third-instar larvae reared on cabbage plants leaves pre-treated with 250 ppm compound assessed as insect mortality measured 2 days post compound treatment	Plutella xylostella	42.5 %
Insecticidal activity against Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) third-instar larvae reared on cabbage plants leaves pre-treated with 125 ppm compound assessed as insect mortality measured 2 days post compound treatment	Plutella xylostella	None
Insecticidal activity against Bombyx mori Syogetsu x Syunrei third-instar larvae assessed as insect mortality upon topical application at 3 ug measured 48 hr post compound treatment	Bombyx mori	None
Insecticidal activity against Bombyx mori Syogetsu x Syunrei third-instar larvae assessed as insect mortality upon topical application at 10 ug measured 48 hr post compound treatment	Bombyx mori	None

Cross References

Resources	Reference
ChEMBL	CHEMBL2271277
PubChem	19776602
SureChEMBL	SCHEMBL8128514

CONTENTS


PREMIER has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 875508. The JU receives support from the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA). The views reflect only the authors’ perspective and the JU is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information this manuscript contains. Elements of the website have been developed under projects PREMIER and the Biocenter Finland Drug Discovery and Chemical Biology network. CSC-IT is thanked for providing computational resources. Content of the website is provided without guarantee for correctness. Data has been collected and integrated from multiple public sources, for the largest: FDA, HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, ChEMBL, IUPHAR/BPS guide to pharmacology, Reactome, UniProt, and Ensembl. Credit is given to Ensembl for collecting species images (provided under public domain licences such as Wikimedia and NHGRI).

PREMIER has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 875508. The JU receives support from the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA). The views reflect only the authors’ perspective and the JU is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information this manuscript contains.

Elements of the website have been developed under projects PREMIER and the Biocenter Finland Drug Discovery and Chemical Biology network. CSC-IT is thanked for providing computational resources. Content of the website is provided without guarantee for correctness. Data has been collected and integrated from multiple public sources, for the largest: FDA, HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, ChEMBL, IUPHAR/BPS guide to pharmacology, Reactome, UniProt, and Ensembl. Credit is given to Ensembl for collecting species images (provided under public domain licences such as Wikimedia and NHGRI).