(E)-2-(METHOXYIMINO)-2-(2-((3-(4-METHOXYPHENYL)-1,4-DIMETHYL-1H-PYRAZOL-5-YLOXY)METHYL)PHENYL)-N-METHYLACETAMIDE


Source	Gaulton A, Kale N, van Westen GJ, Bellis LJ, Bento AP, Davies M, Hersey A, Papadatos G, Forster M, Wege P, Overington JP. A large-scale crop protection bioassay data set. Sci Data. 2015 Jul 7;2:150032. Read more ...


Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Bioactive chemicals	Exact Similarity SubStructure	Threshold (%) >= 70

Structure


InChI Key	VDGYEIPEYBQLFP-YYADALCUSA-N
Smiles	CNC(=O)\C(=N\OC)\c1ccccc1COc2c(C)c(nn2C)c3ccc(OC)cc3
InChI	InChI=1S/C23H26N4O4/c1-15-20(16-10-12-18(29-4)13-11-16)25-27(3)23(15)31-14-17-8-6-7-9-19(17)21(26-30-5)22(28)24-2/h6-13H,14H2,1-5H3,(H,24,28)/b26-21+

Physicochemical Descriptors

Property Name	Value
Molecular Formula	C23H26N4O4
Molecular Weight	422.48
AlogP	3.79
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor	6.0
Hydrogen Bond Donor	1.0
Number of Rotational Bond	8.0
Polar Surface Area	86.97
Molecular species	NEUTRAL
Aromatic Rings	3.0
Heavy Atoms	31.0

Assay Description	Organism	Bioactivity
Insecticidal activity against Leucania venalba at 600 mg/L relative to control	Leucania	100.0 %
Antifungal activity against Blumeria graminis assessed as inhibition at 1.56 mg/L relative to control	Blumeria graminis	75.0 %
Antifungal activity against Blumeria graminis assessed as inhibition at 6.25 mg/L relative to control	Blumeria graminis	100.0 %
Antifungal activity against Pseudoperonospora cubensis assessed as inhibition at 6.25 mg/L relative to control	Pseudoperonospora cubensis	55.0 %
Antifungal activity against Blumeria graminis assessed as inhibition at 400 mg/L relative to control	Blumeria graminis	100.0 %
Antifungal activity against Pseudoperonospora cubensis assessed as inhibition at 25 mg/L relative to control	Pseudoperonospora cubensis	85.0 %
Antifungal activity against Phytophthora infestans assessed as inhibition at 0.92 mg/L relative to control	Phytophthora infestans	50.0 %
Antifungal activity against Pseudoperonospora cubensis assessed as inhibition at 400 mg/L relative to control	Pseudoperonospora cubensis	98.0 %
Antifungal activity against Phytophthora infestans assessed as inhibition at 25 mg/L relative to control	Phytophthora infestans	80.0 %
Antifungal activity against Magnaporthe oryzae assessed as inhibition at 0.92 mg/L relative to control	Magnaporthe oryzae	50.0 %
Antifungal activity against Magnaporthe oryzae assessed as inhibition at 25 mg/L relative to control	Magnaporthe oryzae	100.0 %

Cross References

Resources	Reference
ChEMBL	CHEMBL2230308
PubChem	45276973

CONTENTS


PREMIER has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 875508. The JU receives support from the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA). The views reflect only the authors’ perspective and the JU is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information this manuscript contains. Elements of the website have been developed under projects PREMIER and the Biocenter Finland Drug Discovery and Chemical Biology network. CSC-IT is thanked for providing computational resources. Content of the website is provided without guarantee for correctness. Data has been collected and integrated from multiple public sources, for the largest: FDA, HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, ChEMBL, IUPHAR/BPS guide to pharmacology, Reactome, UniProt, and Ensembl. Credit is given to Ensembl for collecting species images (provided under public domain licences such as Wikimedia and NHGRI).

PREMIER has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 875508. The JU receives support from the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA). The views reflect only the authors’ perspective and the JU is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information this manuscript contains.

Elements of the website have been developed under projects PREMIER and the Biocenter Finland Drug Discovery and Chemical Biology network. CSC-IT is thanked for providing computational resources. Content of the website is provided without guarantee for correctness. Data has been collected and integrated from multiple public sources, for the largest: FDA, HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, ChEMBL, IUPHAR/BPS guide to pharmacology, Reactome, UniProt, and Ensembl. Credit is given to Ensembl for collecting species images (provided under public domain licences such as Wikimedia and NHGRI).