2-ETHOXYETHYL 3-((2-CHLOROTHIAZOL-5-YL)METHYLAMINO)-2-CYANO-3-(METHYLTHIO)ACRYLATE

/static/temp/default.svg

Search structure


Source	Gaulton A, Kale N, van Westen GJ, Bellis LJ, Bento AP, Davies M, Hersey A, Papadatos G, Forster M, Wege P, Overington JP. A large-scale crop protection bioassay data set. Sci Data. 2015 Jul 7;2:150032. Read more ...


Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Bioactive chemicals	Exact Similarity SubStructure	Threshold (%) >= 70

Structure


InChI Key	JEYPIECXQHANAI-ZHACJKMWSA-N
Smiles	CCOCCOC(=O)\C(=C(/NCc1cnc(Cl)s1)\SC)\C#N
InChI	InChI=1S/C13H16ClN3O3S2/c1-3-19-4-5-20-12(18)10(6-15)11(21-2)16-7-9-8-17-13(14)22-9/h8,16H,3-5,7H2,1-2H3/b11-10+

Physicochemical Descriptors

Property Name	Value
Molecular Formula	C13H16ClN3O3S2
Molecular Weight	361.87
AlogP	1.91
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor	7.0
Hydrogen Bond Donor	1.0
Number of Rotational Bond	10.0
Polar Surface Area	137.78
Molecular species	NEUTRAL
Aromatic Rings	1.0
Heavy Atoms	22.0

Assay Description	Organism	Bioactivity	Reference
Postemergence herbicidal activity against Brassica napus (oilseed rape) under greenhouse condition at 150 g/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Brassica napus	95.0 %
Postemergence herbicidal activity against Brassica napus (oilseed rape) under greenhouse condition at 300 g/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Brassica napus	100.0 %
Postemergence herbicidal activity against Brassica napus (oilseed rape) under greenhouse condition at 75 g/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Brassica napus	77.0 %
Postemergence herbicidal activity against Brassica napus (oilseed rape) under greenhouse condition at 18.75 g/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Brassica napus	11.0 %
Postemergence herbicidal activity against Brassica napus (oilseed rape) under greenhouse condition at 37.5 g/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Brassica napus	45.0 %
Post-emergence herbicidal activity against Amaranthus retroflexus under greenhouse condition at 750 kg/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Amaranthus retroflexus	91.0 %
Post-emergence herbicidal activity against Amaranthus retroflexus under greenhouse condition at 375 kg/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Amaranthus retroflexus	48.0 %
Postemergence herbicidal activity against Brassica napus (oilseed rape) under greenhouse condition at 750 g/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Brassica napus	100.0 %
Post-emergence herbicidal activity against Amaranthus retroflexus under greenhouse condition at 187.5 kg/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Amaranthus retroflexus	41.0 %
Postemergence herbicidal activity against Brassica napus (oilseed rape) under greenhouse condition at 375 g/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Brassica napus	57.0 %
Postemergence herbicidal activity against Brassica napus (oilseed rape) under greenhouse condition at 1.5 kg/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Brassica napus	100.0 %
Postemergence herbicidal activity against Brassica napus (oilseed rape) under greenhouse condition at 187.5 g/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Brassica napus	48.0 %
Post-emergence herbicidal activity against Amaranthus retroflexus under greenhouse condition at 1.5 kg/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Amaranthus retroflexus	78.0 %
Preemergence herbicidal activity against Brassica napus (oilseed rape) under greenhouse condition at 1.5 kg/ha applied immediately after seed planting	Brassica napus	40.0 %
Postemergence herbicidal activity against Medicago sativa (alfalfa) under greenhouse condition at 1.5 kg/ha applied after expansion of true leaf	Medicago sativa	49.0 %
Pre-emergence herbicidal activity against Amaranthus retroflexus under greenhouse condition at 1.5 kg/ha applied immediately after seed planting	Amaranthus retroflexus	76.0 %
Preemergence herbicidal activity against Medicago sativa (alfalfa) under greenhouse condition at 1.5 kg/ha applied immediately after seed planting	Medicago sativa	28.0 %

Cross References

Resources	Reference
ChEMBL	CHEMBL2269096
PubChem	11256983

CONTENTS

PREMIER has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 875508. The JU receives support from the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA). The views reflect only the authors’ perspective and the JU is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information this manuscript contains.

Elements of the website have been developed under projects PREMIER and the Biocenter Finland Drug Discovery and Chemical Biology network. CSC-IT is thanked for providing computational resources. Content of the website is provided without guarantee for correctness. Data has been collected and integrated from multiple public sources, for the largest: FDA, HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, ChEMBL, IUPHAR/BPS guide to pharmacology, Reactome, UniProt, and Ensembl. Credit is given to Ensembl for collecting species images (provided under public domain licences such as Wikimedia and NHGRI).