|
Binding affinity towards Serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A receptor by displacement of [3H]-(+)-8-OH-DPAT.
|
Homo sapiens
|
0.4
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : Synthesis and biological activities of (R)-5,6-dihydro-N,N-dimethyl-4H-imidazo[4,5,1-ij]quinolin-5-amine and its metabolites.
Year : 1997
Volume : 40
Issue : 5
First Page : 639
Last Page : 646
Authors : Heier RF, Dolak LA, Duncan JN, Hyslop DK, Lipton MF, Martin IJ, Mauragis MA, Piercey MF, Nichols NF, Schreur PJ, Smith MW, Moon MW.
Abstract : The imidazoquinoline (R)-5,6-Dihydro-N,N-dimethyl-4H-imidazo[4,5,1-ij]quinolin-5-amine [(R)-3] is a potent dopamine agonist when tested in animals but surprisingly shows very low affinity in in vitro binding assays. When incubated with mouse or monkey liver S9 microsomes, (R)-3 is metabolized by N-demethylation and oxidation to (R)-5,6-dihydro-5-(methylamino)-4H-imidazo[4,5,1-ij]quinolin-2(1H) -one [(R)-6], intermediate metabolites, where N-demethylation to the imidazoquinoline (R)-4 and where oxidation to the imidazoquinolinone (R)-5 has taken place, are also observed in these incubates. A cross-species study on the metabolism of (R)-3 in vitro has shown large variations in the extent of metabolism from species to species. Imidazoquinolinones (R)-5 and (R)-6 have comparable activity to (R)-3 in animals and also show good dopaminergic (D2) and serotonergic (5HT1A) activities in binding assays. It is probable that these metabolites account at least in part for the in vivo activity found for (R)-3. Efficient syntheses for compounds 3-6 as single enantiomers from quinoline are presented together with information on the biological activities and metabolic stabilities of these compounds.
|
Affinity towards Dopamine receptor D1
|
Cercopithecidae
|
77.0
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : CoMFA-based prediction of agonist affinities at recombinant D1 vs D2 dopamine receptors.
Year : 1998
Volume : 41
Issue : 22
First Page : 4385
Last Page : 4399
Authors : Wilcox RE, Tseng T, Brusniak MY, Ginsburg B, Pearlman RS, Teeter M, DuRand C, Starr S, Neve KA.
Abstract : We have previously shown that using agonist affinity at recombinant receptors selectively expressed in clonal cells as the dependent variable in three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship studies (3D-QSAR) presents a unique opportunity for accuracy and precision in measurement. Thus, a comparison of affinity's structural determinants for a set of compounds at two different recombinant dopamine receptors represents an attainable goal for 3D-QSAR. A molecular database of bound conformations of 16 structurally diverse agonists was established by alignment with a high-affinity template compound for the D1 receptor, 3-allyl-6-bromo-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4, 5-tetrahydro-1H-benzazepin. A second molecular database of the bound conformations of the same compounds was established against a second template for the D2 receptor, bromocriptine. These aligned structures suggested three-point pharmacophore maps (one cationic nitrogen and two electronegative centers) for the two dopamine receptors, which differed primarily in the height of the nitrogen above the plane of the catechol ring and in the nature of the hydrogen-bonding region. The ln(1/KL) values for the low-affinity agonist binding conformation at recombinant D1 and D2 dopamine receptors stably expressed in C6 glioma cells were used as the target property for the CoMFA (comparative molecular field analysis) of the 16 aligned structures. The resulting CoMFA models yielded cross-validated R2 (q2) values (standard error of prediction) of 0. 879 (1.471, with five principal components) and 0.834 (1.652, with five principal components) for D1 and D2 affinity, respectively. The simple R2 values (standard error of the estimate) were 0.994 (0.323) and 0.999 (0.116), respectively, for D1 and D2 receptor. F values were 341 and 2465 for D1 and D2 models, respectively, with 5 and 10 df. The predictive utility of the CoMFA model was evaluated at both receptors using the dopamine agonists, apomorphine and 7-OH-DPAT. Predictions of KL were accurate at both receptors. Flexible 3D searches of several chemical databases (NCI, MDDR, CMC, ACD, and Maybridge) were done using basic pharmacophore models at each receptor to determine the similarity of hit lists between the two models. The D1 and D2 models yielded different lists of lead compounds. Several of the lead compounds closely resembled high-affinity training set compounds. Finally, homology modeling of agonist binding to the D2 receptor revealed some consistencies and inconsistencies with the CoMFA-derived D2 model and provided a possible rationale for features of the D2 CoMFA contour map. Together these results suggest that CoMFA-homology based models may provide useful insights concerning differential agonist-receptor interactions at related receptors. The results also suggest that comparisons of CoMFA models for two structurally related receptors may be a fruitful approach for differential QSAR.
|
Affinity towards Dopamine receptor D2
|
None
|
0.8
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : CoMFA-based prediction of agonist affinities at recombinant D1 vs D2 dopamine receptors.
Year : 1998
Volume : 41
Issue : 22
First Page : 4385
Last Page : 4399
Authors : Wilcox RE, Tseng T, Brusniak MY, Ginsburg B, Pearlman RS, Teeter M, DuRand C, Starr S, Neve KA.
Abstract : We have previously shown that using agonist affinity at recombinant receptors selectively expressed in clonal cells as the dependent variable in three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship studies (3D-QSAR) presents a unique opportunity for accuracy and precision in measurement. Thus, a comparison of affinity's structural determinants for a set of compounds at two different recombinant dopamine receptors represents an attainable goal for 3D-QSAR. A molecular database of bound conformations of 16 structurally diverse agonists was established by alignment with a high-affinity template compound for the D1 receptor, 3-allyl-6-bromo-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4, 5-tetrahydro-1H-benzazepin. A second molecular database of the bound conformations of the same compounds was established against a second template for the D2 receptor, bromocriptine. These aligned structures suggested three-point pharmacophore maps (one cationic nitrogen and two electronegative centers) for the two dopamine receptors, which differed primarily in the height of the nitrogen above the plane of the catechol ring and in the nature of the hydrogen-bonding region. The ln(1/KL) values for the low-affinity agonist binding conformation at recombinant D1 and D2 dopamine receptors stably expressed in C6 glioma cells were used as the target property for the CoMFA (comparative molecular field analysis) of the 16 aligned structures. The resulting CoMFA models yielded cross-validated R2 (q2) values (standard error of prediction) of 0. 879 (1.471, with five principal components) and 0.834 (1.652, with five principal components) for D1 and D2 affinity, respectively. The simple R2 values (standard error of the estimate) were 0.994 (0.323) and 0.999 (0.116), respectively, for D1 and D2 receptor. F values were 341 and 2465 for D1 and D2 models, respectively, with 5 and 10 df. The predictive utility of the CoMFA model was evaluated at both receptors using the dopamine agonists, apomorphine and 7-OH-DPAT. Predictions of KL were accurate at both receptors. Flexible 3D searches of several chemical databases (NCI, MDDR, CMC, ACD, and Maybridge) were done using basic pharmacophore models at each receptor to determine the similarity of hit lists between the two models. The D1 and D2 models yielded different lists of lead compounds. Several of the lead compounds closely resembled high-affinity training set compounds. Finally, homology modeling of agonist binding to the D2 receptor revealed some consistencies and inconsistencies with the CoMFA-derived D2 model and provided a possible rationale for features of the D2 CoMFA contour map. Together these results suggest that CoMFA-homology based models may provide useful insights concerning differential agonist-receptor interactions at related receptors. The results also suggest that comparisons of CoMFA models for two structurally related receptors may be a fruitful approach for differential QSAR.
|
Binding affinity towards Dopamine receptor D2 by displacement of [3H]U-86170.
|
Homo sapiens
|
0.5
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : Synthesis and biological activities of (R)-5,6-dihydro-N,N-dimethyl-4H-imidazo[4,5,1-ij]quinolin-5-amine and its metabolites.
Year : 1997
Volume : 40
Issue : 5
First Page : 639
Last Page : 646
Authors : Heier RF, Dolak LA, Duncan JN, Hyslop DK, Lipton MF, Martin IJ, Mauragis MA, Piercey MF, Nichols NF, Schreur PJ, Smith MW, Moon MW.
Abstract : The imidazoquinoline (R)-5,6-Dihydro-N,N-dimethyl-4H-imidazo[4,5,1-ij]quinolin-5-amine [(R)-3] is a potent dopamine agonist when tested in animals but surprisingly shows very low affinity in in vitro binding assays. When incubated with mouse or monkey liver S9 microsomes, (R)-3 is metabolized by N-demethylation and oxidation to (R)-5,6-dihydro-5-(methylamino)-4H-imidazo[4,5,1-ij]quinolin-2(1H) -one [(R)-6], intermediate metabolites, where N-demethylation to the imidazoquinoline (R)-4 and where oxidation to the imidazoquinolinone (R)-5 has taken place, are also observed in these incubates. A cross-species study on the metabolism of (R)-3 in vitro has shown large variations in the extent of metabolism from species to species. Imidazoquinolinones (R)-5 and (R)-6 have comparable activity to (R)-3 in animals and also show good dopaminergic (D2) and serotonergic (5HT1A) activities in binding assays. It is probable that these metabolites account at least in part for the in vivo activity found for (R)-3. Efficient syntheses for compounds 3-6 as single enantiomers from quinoline are presented together with information on the biological activities and metabolic stabilities of these compounds.
|
In vitro affinity at mutant D2 receptor (S194A) in C6 (glioma) cell membranes.
|
None
|
0.3
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : CoMFA-based prediction of agonist affinities at recombinant wild type versus serine to alanine point mutated D2 dopamine receptors.
Year : 2000
Volume : 43
Issue : 16
First Page : 3005
Last Page : 3019
Authors : Wilcox RE, Huang WH, Brusniak MY, Wilcox DM, Pearlman RS, Teeter MM, DuRand CJ, Wiens BL, Neve KA.
Abstract : Agonist affinity changes dramatically as a result of serine to alanine mutations (S193A, S194A, and S197A) within the fifth transmembrane region of D2 dopamine receptors and other receptors for monoamine neurotransmitters. However, agonist 2D-structure does not predict which drugs will be sensitive to which point mutations. Modeling drug-receptor interactions at the 3D level offers considerably more promise in this regard. In particular, a comparison of the same test set of agonists across receptors differing minimally (point mutations) offers promise to enhance the understanding of the structural bases for drug-receptor interactions. We have previously shown that comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) can be applied to comparisons of affinity at recombinant D1 and D2 dopamine receptors for the same set of agonists, a differential QSAR. Here, we predicted agonist K(L) for the same set of agonists at wild type D2 vs S193A, S194A, and S197A receptors using CoMFA. Each model used bromocriptine as the template. ln(1/K(L)) values for the low-affinity agonist binding conformation at recombinant wild type and mutant D2 dopamine receptors stably expressed in C6 glioma cells were used as the target property for the CoMFA of the 16 aligned agonist structures. The resulting CoMFA models yielded cross-validated R(2) (q(2)) values ranging from 0.835 to 0.864 and simple R(2) values ranging from 0.999 to 1.000. Predictions of test compound affinities at WT and each mutant receptor were close to measured affinity values. This finding confirmed the predictive ability of the models and their differences from one another. The results strongly support the idea that CoMFA models of the same training set of compounds applied to WT vs mutant receptors can accurately predict differences in drug affinity at each. Furthermore, in a "proof of principle", two different templates were used to derive the CoMFA model for the WT and S193A mutant receptors. Pergolide was chosen as an alternate template because it showed a significant increase in affinity as a result of the S193A mutation. In this instance both the bromocriptine- and pergolide-based CoMFA models were similar to one another but different from those for the WT receptor using bromocriptine- or pergolide- as templates. The pergolide-based S193A model was more strikingly different from that of the WT receptor than was the bromocriptine-based S193A model. This suggests that a "dual-template" approach to differential CoMFA may have special value in elucidating key differences across related receptor types and in determining important elements of the drug-receptor interaction.
|
In vitro affinity at mutant D2 receptor (S194A) in C6 (glioma) cell membranes.
|
None
|
2.3
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : CoMFA-based prediction of agonist affinities at recombinant wild type versus serine to alanine point mutated D2 dopamine receptors.
Year : 2000
Volume : 43
Issue : 16
First Page : 3005
Last Page : 3019
Authors : Wilcox RE, Huang WH, Brusniak MY, Wilcox DM, Pearlman RS, Teeter MM, DuRand CJ, Wiens BL, Neve KA.
Abstract : Agonist affinity changes dramatically as a result of serine to alanine mutations (S193A, S194A, and S197A) within the fifth transmembrane region of D2 dopamine receptors and other receptors for monoamine neurotransmitters. However, agonist 2D-structure does not predict which drugs will be sensitive to which point mutations. Modeling drug-receptor interactions at the 3D level offers considerably more promise in this regard. In particular, a comparison of the same test set of agonists across receptors differing minimally (point mutations) offers promise to enhance the understanding of the structural bases for drug-receptor interactions. We have previously shown that comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) can be applied to comparisons of affinity at recombinant D1 and D2 dopamine receptors for the same set of agonists, a differential QSAR. Here, we predicted agonist K(L) for the same set of agonists at wild type D2 vs S193A, S194A, and S197A receptors using CoMFA. Each model used bromocriptine as the template. ln(1/K(L)) values for the low-affinity agonist binding conformation at recombinant wild type and mutant D2 dopamine receptors stably expressed in C6 glioma cells were used as the target property for the CoMFA of the 16 aligned agonist structures. The resulting CoMFA models yielded cross-validated R(2) (q(2)) values ranging from 0.835 to 0.864 and simple R(2) values ranging from 0.999 to 1.000. Predictions of test compound affinities at WT and each mutant receptor were close to measured affinity values. This finding confirmed the predictive ability of the models and their differences from one another. The results strongly support the idea that CoMFA models of the same training set of compounds applied to WT vs mutant receptors can accurately predict differences in drug affinity at each. Furthermore, in a "proof of principle", two different templates were used to derive the CoMFA model for the WT and S193A mutant receptors. Pergolide was chosen as an alternate template because it showed a significant increase in affinity as a result of the S193A mutation. In this instance both the bromocriptine- and pergolide-based CoMFA models were similar to one another but different from those for the WT receptor using bromocriptine- or pergolide- as templates. The pergolide-based S193A model was more strikingly different from that of the WT receptor than was the bromocriptine-based S193A model. This suggests that a "dual-template" approach to differential CoMFA may have special value in elucidating key differences across related receptor types and in determining important elements of the drug-receptor interaction.
|
In vitro affinity at mutant D2 receptor (S197A) in C6 (glioma) cell membranes.
|
None
|
0.4
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : CoMFA-based prediction of agonist affinities at recombinant wild type versus serine to alanine point mutated D2 dopamine receptors.
Year : 2000
Volume : 43
Issue : 16
First Page : 3005
Last Page : 3019
Authors : Wilcox RE, Huang WH, Brusniak MY, Wilcox DM, Pearlman RS, Teeter MM, DuRand CJ, Wiens BL, Neve KA.
Abstract : Agonist affinity changes dramatically as a result of serine to alanine mutations (S193A, S194A, and S197A) within the fifth transmembrane region of D2 dopamine receptors and other receptors for monoamine neurotransmitters. However, agonist 2D-structure does not predict which drugs will be sensitive to which point mutations. Modeling drug-receptor interactions at the 3D level offers considerably more promise in this regard. In particular, a comparison of the same test set of agonists across receptors differing minimally (point mutations) offers promise to enhance the understanding of the structural bases for drug-receptor interactions. We have previously shown that comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) can be applied to comparisons of affinity at recombinant D1 and D2 dopamine receptors for the same set of agonists, a differential QSAR. Here, we predicted agonist K(L) for the same set of agonists at wild type D2 vs S193A, S194A, and S197A receptors using CoMFA. Each model used bromocriptine as the template. ln(1/K(L)) values for the low-affinity agonist binding conformation at recombinant wild type and mutant D2 dopamine receptors stably expressed in C6 glioma cells were used as the target property for the CoMFA of the 16 aligned agonist structures. The resulting CoMFA models yielded cross-validated R(2) (q(2)) values ranging from 0.835 to 0.864 and simple R(2) values ranging from 0.999 to 1.000. Predictions of test compound affinities at WT and each mutant receptor were close to measured affinity values. This finding confirmed the predictive ability of the models and their differences from one another. The results strongly support the idea that CoMFA models of the same training set of compounds applied to WT vs mutant receptors can accurately predict differences in drug affinity at each. Furthermore, in a "proof of principle", two different templates were used to derive the CoMFA model for the WT and S193A mutant receptors. Pergolide was chosen as an alternate template because it showed a significant increase in affinity as a result of the S193A mutation. In this instance both the bromocriptine- and pergolide-based CoMFA models were similar to one another but different from those for the WT receptor using bromocriptine- or pergolide- as templates. The pergolide-based S193A model was more strikingly different from that of the WT receptor than was the bromocriptine-based S193A model. This suggests that a "dual-template" approach to differential CoMFA may have special value in elucidating key differences across related receptor types and in determining important elements of the drug-receptor interaction.
|
In vitro affinity at wild type Dopamine receptor D2 on C6 (glioma) cell membranes.
|
None
|
0.6
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : CoMFA-based prediction of agonist affinities at recombinant wild type versus serine to alanine point mutated D2 dopamine receptors.
Year : 2000
Volume : 43
Issue : 16
First Page : 3005
Last Page : 3019
Authors : Wilcox RE, Huang WH, Brusniak MY, Wilcox DM, Pearlman RS, Teeter MM, DuRand CJ, Wiens BL, Neve KA.
Abstract : Agonist affinity changes dramatically as a result of serine to alanine mutations (S193A, S194A, and S197A) within the fifth transmembrane region of D2 dopamine receptors and other receptors for monoamine neurotransmitters. However, agonist 2D-structure does not predict which drugs will be sensitive to which point mutations. Modeling drug-receptor interactions at the 3D level offers considerably more promise in this regard. In particular, a comparison of the same test set of agonists across receptors differing minimally (point mutations) offers promise to enhance the understanding of the structural bases for drug-receptor interactions. We have previously shown that comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) can be applied to comparisons of affinity at recombinant D1 and D2 dopamine receptors for the same set of agonists, a differential QSAR. Here, we predicted agonist K(L) for the same set of agonists at wild type D2 vs S193A, S194A, and S197A receptors using CoMFA. Each model used bromocriptine as the template. ln(1/K(L)) values for the low-affinity agonist binding conformation at recombinant wild type and mutant D2 dopamine receptors stably expressed in C6 glioma cells were used as the target property for the CoMFA of the 16 aligned agonist structures. The resulting CoMFA models yielded cross-validated R(2) (q(2)) values ranging from 0.835 to 0.864 and simple R(2) values ranging from 0.999 to 1.000. Predictions of test compound affinities at WT and each mutant receptor were close to measured affinity values. This finding confirmed the predictive ability of the models and their differences from one another. The results strongly support the idea that CoMFA models of the same training set of compounds applied to WT vs mutant receptors can accurately predict differences in drug affinity at each. Furthermore, in a "proof of principle", two different templates were used to derive the CoMFA model for the WT and S193A mutant receptors. Pergolide was chosen as an alternate template because it showed a significant increase in affinity as a result of the S193A mutation. In this instance both the bromocriptine- and pergolide-based CoMFA models were similar to one another but different from those for the WT receptor using bromocriptine- or pergolide- as templates. The pergolide-based S193A model was more strikingly different from that of the WT receptor than was the bromocriptine-based S193A model. This suggests that a "dual-template" approach to differential CoMFA may have special value in elucidating key differences across related receptor types and in determining important elements of the drug-receptor interaction.
|
Binding affinity towards Dopamine receptor D3 by displacement of [3H](+)-7-OH-DPAT.
|
Homo sapiens
|
1.7
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : Synthesis and biological activities of (R)-5,6-dihydro-N,N-dimethyl-4H-imidazo[4,5,1-ij]quinolin-5-amine and its metabolites.
Year : 1997
Volume : 40
Issue : 5
First Page : 639
Last Page : 646
Authors : Heier RF, Dolak LA, Duncan JN, Hyslop DK, Lipton MF, Martin IJ, Mauragis MA, Piercey MF, Nichols NF, Schreur PJ, Smith MW, Moon MW.
Abstract : The imidazoquinoline (R)-5,6-Dihydro-N,N-dimethyl-4H-imidazo[4,5,1-ij]quinolin-5-amine [(R)-3] is a potent dopamine agonist when tested in animals but surprisingly shows very low affinity in in vitro binding assays. When incubated with mouse or monkey liver S9 microsomes, (R)-3 is metabolized by N-demethylation and oxidation to (R)-5,6-dihydro-5-(methylamino)-4H-imidazo[4,5,1-ij]quinolin-2(1H) -one [(R)-6], intermediate metabolites, where N-demethylation to the imidazoquinoline (R)-4 and where oxidation to the imidazoquinolinone (R)-5 has taken place, are also observed in these incubates. A cross-species study on the metabolism of (R)-3 in vitro has shown large variations in the extent of metabolism from species to species. Imidazoquinolinones (R)-5 and (R)-6 have comparable activity to (R)-3 in animals and also show good dopaminergic (D2) and serotonergic (5HT1A) activities in binding assays. It is probable that these metabolites account at least in part for the in vivo activity found for (R)-3. Efficient syntheses for compounds 3-6 as single enantiomers from quinoline are presented together with information on the biological activities and metabolic stabilities of these compounds.
|
In vitro evaluation in the dog saphenous vein for maximal response
|
Canis lupus familiaris
|
70.0
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : (+/-) 3-Amino-6-carboxamido-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocarbazole: a conformationally restricted analogue of 5-carboxamidotryptamine with selectivity for the serotonin 5-HT1D receptor.
Year : 1993
Volume : 36
Issue : 13
First Page : 1918
Last Page : 1919
Authors : King FD, Brown AM, Gaster LM, Kaumann AJ, Medhurst AD, Parker SG, Parsons AA, Patch TL, Raval P.
|
In vitro evaluation in rabbit basilar artery for maximal response
|
Oryctolagus cuniculus
|
280.0
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : (+/-) 3-Amino-6-carboxamido-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocarbazole: a conformationally restricted analogue of 5-carboxamidotryptamine with selectivity for the serotonin 5-HT1D receptor.
Year : 1993
Volume : 36
Issue : 13
First Page : 1918
Last Page : 1919
Authors : King FD, Brown AM, Gaster LM, Kaumann AJ, Medhurst AD, Parker SG, Parsons AA, Patch TL, Raval P.
|
Inhibition constant against [3H]-spiperone binding to human Dopamine receptor D3 expressed in CHO cells
|
Homo sapiens
|
0.1413
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : CoMFA and CoMSIA investigations revealing novel insights into the binding modes of dopamine D3 receptor agonists.
Year : 2005
Volume : 48
Issue : 7
First Page : 2493
Last Page : 2508
Authors : Boeckler F, Ohnmacht U, Lehmann T, Utz W, Hübner H, Gmeiner P.
Abstract : As an extension of a series of dopamine D(3) receptor agonists involving FAUC 54, ex-chiral pool synthesis, and biological evaluation of 3-substituted 7-aminotetrahydroindolizines was performed. Considering the structural features of both series of enantiomers, we developed a novel alignment hypothesis for D(3) agonists, allowing for the placement of the aromatic moieties on two alternative, adjacent positions. CoMFA and CoMSIA analyses yielded significant cross-validated q(2) values of 0.726 and 0.590, respectively, when a newly invented program application (IRAS) controlling the alignment selection proved to be useful. Employing the CoMFA/CoMSIA contribution maps, we were able to transform a previously constructed homology model of the D(3) receptor from an inactive into an activate state. Besides the established ionic interactions, we propose pi-stacking with Phe6.51 and a hydrogen bond between His6.55 and the acyl moiety to be primarily involved in the D(3) receptor binding of FAUC 54 and its analogues.
|
Binding affinity to 5HT1A receptor
|
None
|
1.995
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : Physical binding pocket induction for affinity prediction.
Year : 2009
Volume : 52
Issue : 19
First Page : 6107
Last Page : 6125
Authors : Langham JJ, Cleves AE, Spitzer R, Kirshner D, Jain AN.
Abstract : Computational methods for predicting ligand affinity where no protein structure is known generally take the form of regression analysis based on molecular features that have only a tangential relationship to a protein/ligand binding event. Such methods have limited utility when structural variation moves beyond congeneric series. We present a novel approach based on the multiple-instance learning method of Compass, where a physical model of a binding site is induced from ligands and their corresponding activity data. The model consists of molecular fragments that can account for multiple positions of literal protein residues. We demonstrate the method on 5HT1a ligands by training on a series with limited scaffold variation and testing on numerous ligands with variant scaffolds. Predictive error was between 0.5 and 1.0 log units (0.7-1.4 kcal/mol), with statistically significant rank correlations. Accurate activity predictions of novel ligands were demonstrated using a validation approach where a small number of ligands of limited structural variation known at a fixed time point were used to make predictions on a blind test set of widely varying molecules, some discovered at a much later time point.
|
DRUGMATRIX: Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT1A radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] 8-OH-DPAT)
|
None
|
0.465
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT1A radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] 8-OH-DPAT)
|
None
|
0.266
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT1B radioligand binding (ligand: [125I] Cyanopindolol)
|
Rattus norvegicus
|
10.0
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT1B radioligand binding (ligand: [125I] Cyanopindolol)
|
Rattus norvegicus
|
4.594
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT2A radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Ketanserin)
|
None
|
3.04
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT2A radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Ketanserin)
|
None
|
0.868
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Alpha-1A adrenergic receptor radioligand binding (ligand: prazosin)
|
Rattus norvegicus
|
23.0
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Alpha-1A adrenergic receptor radioligand binding (ligand: prazosin)
|
Rattus norvegicus
|
9.188
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Alpha-1B adrenergic receptor radioligand binding (ligand: prazosin)
|
Rattus norvegicus
|
121.0
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Alpha-1B adrenergic receptor radioligand binding (ligand: prazosin)
|
Rattus norvegicus
|
67.0
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Alpha-1D adrenergic receptor radioligand binding (ligand: prazosin)
|
None
|
41.0
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Alpha-1D adrenergic receptor radioligand binding (ligand: prazosin)
|
None
|
20.0
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Alpha-2A adrenergic receptor radioligand binding (ligand: MK-912)
|
None
|
0.31
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Alpha-2A adrenergic receptor radioligand binding (ligand: MK-912)
|
None
|
0.116
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Alpha-2B adrenergic receptor radioligand binding (ligand: Rauwolscine)
|
None
|
0.518
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Alpha-2B adrenergic receptor radioligand binding (ligand: Rauwolscine)
|
None
|
0.237
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Adrenergic Alpha-2C radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] MK-912)
|
None
|
4.308
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Adrenergic Alpha-2C radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] MK-912)
|
None
|
0.626
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Adrenergic beta1 radioligand binding (ligand: [125I] Cyanopindolol)
|
None
|
559.0
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Adrenergic beta1 radioligand binding (ligand: [125I] Cyanopindolol)
|
None
|
323.0
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Adrenergic beta2 radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] CGP-12177)
|
None
|
41.0
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Adrenergic beta2 radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] CGP-12177)
|
None
|
29.0
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT2B radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Lysergic acid diethylamide)
|
None
|
5.095
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT2B radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Lysergic acid diethylamide)
|
None
|
3.242
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT2C radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Mesulergine)
|
None
|
20.0
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT2C radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Mesulergine)
|
None
|
10.0
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT6 radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Lysergic acid diethylamide)
|
None
|
12.0
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT6 radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Lysergic acid diethylamide)
|
None
|
5.514
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: CYP450, 2D6 enzyme inhibition (substrate: 3-Cyano-7-ethoxycoumarin)
|
None
|
16.0
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Dopamine D1 radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] SCH-23390)
|
None
|
173.0
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Dopamine D1 radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] SCH-23390)
|
None
|
86.0
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Dopamine D2L radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Spiperone)
|
None
|
2.86
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Dopamine D2L radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Spiperone)
|
None
|
0.953
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Dopamine D3 radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Spiperone)
|
None
|
0.173
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Dopamine D3 radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Spiperone)
|
None
|
0.059
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Histamine H1, Central radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Pyrilamine)
|
None
|
160.0
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Histamine H1, Central radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Pyrilamine)
|
None
|
19.0
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
DRUGMATRIX: Imidazoline I2, Central radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Idazoxan)
|
Rattus norvegicus
|
1.606
nM
|
|
DRUGMATRIX: Imidazoline I2, Central radioligand binding (ligand: [3H] Idazoxan)
|
Rattus norvegicus
|
1.071
nM
|
|
Title : DrugMatrix in vitro pharmacology data
Authors : Scott S. Auerbach, DrugMatrix¨ and ToxFX¨ Coordinator National Toxicology Program
Abstract : The DrugMatrix Pharmacology data is a subset of the data freely available from the National Toxicology Program. For more details see:https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/drugmatrix/index.html
|
Displacement of [125]iodosulpride from human recombinant dopamine D2L receptor expressed in CHO cells after 30 mins
|
Homo sapiens
|
0.66
nM
|
|
Displacement of [125]iodosulpride from human recombinant dopamine D2L receptor expressed in CHO cells after 30 mins
|
Homo sapiens
|
0.6607
nM
|
|
Journal : J. Med. Chem.
Title : Novel aza-analogous ergoline derived scaffolds as potent serotonin 5-HT₆ and dopamine D₂ receptor ligands.
Year : 2014
Volume : 57
Issue : 13
First Page : 5823
Last Page : 5828
Authors : Krogsgaard-Larsen N, Jensen AA, Schrøder TJ, Christoffersen CT, Kehler J.
Abstract : By introducing distal substituents on a tetracyclic scaffold resembling the ergoline structure, two series of analogues were achieved exhibiting subnanomolar receptor binding affinities for the dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT6 receptor subtype, respectively. While the 5-HT6 ligands were antagonists, the D2 ligands displayed intrinsic activities ranging from full agonism to partial agonism with low intrinsic activity. These structures could potentially be interesting for treatment of neurological diseases such as schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, and cognitive deficits.
|
Agonist activity at dopamine D2 receptor short isoform (unknown origin) expressed in mouse NIH/3T3 cells by R-SAT assay
|
Homo sapiens
|
0.01
nM
|
|
Title : Selective serotonin 2A/2C receptor inverse agonists as therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases
Year : 2004
|
Agonist activity at 5HT2A receptor (unknown origin) expressed in mouse NIH/3T3 cells by R-SAT assay
|
Homo sapiens
|
0.02239
nM
|
|
Title : Selective serotonin 2A/2C receptor inverse agonists as therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases
Year : 2004
|
Agonist activity at 5HT2C receptor VGV isoform (unknown origin) expressed in mouse NIH/3T3 cells by R-SAT assay
|
Homo sapiens
|
24.55
nM
|
|
Title : Selective serotonin 2A/2C receptor inverse agonists as therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases
Year : 2004
|
Agonist activity at recombinant human D4 receptor expressed in CHOK1 cells assessed as induction of beta arrestin2 recruitment measured after 30 mins by coelenterazine-based beta-galactosidase reporter gene assay
|
Homo sapiens
|
88.5
nM
|
|
Journal : J Med Chem
Title : Leveraging a Low-Affinity Diazaspiro Orthosteric Fragment to Reduce Dopamine D<sub>3</sub> Receptor (D<sub>3</sub>R) Ligand Promiscuity across Highly Conserved Aminergic G-Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs).
Year : 2019
Volume : 62
Issue : 10
First Page : 5132
Last Page : 5147
Authors : Reilly SW, Riad AA, Hsieh CJ, Sahlholm K, Jacome DA, Griffin S, Taylor M, Weng CC, Xu K, Kirschner N, Luedtke RR, Parry C, Malhotra S, Karanicolas J, Mach RH.
Abstract : Previously, we reported a 3-(2-methoxyphenyl)-9-(3-((4-methyl-5-phenyl-4 H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)propyl)-3,9-diazaspiro[5.5]undecane (1) compound with excellent dopamine D<sub>3</sub> receptor (D<sub>3</sub>R) affinity (D<sub>3</sub>R K<sub>i</sub> = 12.0 nM) and selectivity (D<sub>2</sub>R/D<sub>3</sub>R ratio = 905). Herein, we present derivatives of 1 with comparable D<sub>3</sub>R affinity (32, D<sub>3</sub>R K<sub>i</sub> = 3.2 nM, D<sub>2</sub>R/D<sub>3</sub>R ratio = 60) and selectivity (30, D<sub>3</sub>R K<sub>i</sub> = 21.0 nM, D<sub>2</sub>R/D<sub>3</sub>R ratio = 934). Fragmentation of 1 revealed orthosteric fragment 5a to express an unusually low D<sub>3</sub>R affinity ( K<sub>i</sub> = 2.7 μM). Compared to piperazine congener 31, which retains a high-affinity orthosteric fragment (5d, D<sub>3</sub>R K<sub>i</sub> = 23.9 nM), 1 was found to be more selective for the D<sub>3</sub>R among D<sub>1</sub>- and D<sub>2</sub>-like receptors and exhibited negligible off-target interactions at serotoninergic and adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), common off-target sites for piperazine-containing D<sub>3</sub>R scaffolds. This study provides a unique rationale for implementing weakly potent orthosteric fragments into D<sub>3</sub>R ligand systems to minimize drug promiscuity at other aminergic GPCR sites.
